Monday, May 15, 2017

Make your voice heard on the upcoming APS rate case

Write the Arizona Corporation Commission about the upcoming rate case to support the growth of solar in our state and not undermine the viability of residential rooftop solar.

Where to share your comments

Online comments: http://eservice.azcc.gov/Utilities/PublicComment
Docket# E-01345A-16-0036

or by mail:
Arizona Corporate Commission
1200 W. Washington
Phoenix, AZ 85007-2996
P: (602) 542-3477

What the Sustainability Alliance wants to see happen

Our new member, Marty Landa with Inspiration of Sedona, has brought us important insight on the upcoming Arizona Public Service rate case.  As a group, our members discussed the issues and what we believe is best for the future of Arizona.

Here are the four issues you should be concerned about, along with what we recommend you write the ACC to do as an alternative. Below these 4 bullet points, we have provided additional background information.

  1. DOES APS EVEN NEED A RATE INCREASE? According to the Arizona PRIG, APS may not need a rate increase. Prior to the rate case, the Arizona Corporate Commission staff and the Residential Utility Consumer office concluded that APS did not need to increase rates. What changed? 

    TELL THE ACC: The ACC should carefully examine whether APS truly needs to change the rates at all.
  2. THIS WILL UNDERMINE ROOFTOP SOLAR INVESTMENTS AND JOBS. The structure of the new rates and rate structure may impede our progress toward renewable energy and in particular, they undermine the economics of residential solar. Solar and battery technologies are advancing quickly and maintaining that market will help Arizona switch to renewable energy in the long run. It's also a good source of local, living wage jobs.
    TELL THE ACC: Reinstate net metering or build in other incentives to ensure that rooftop solar continues to have a reasonable rate of return. Solar customers should be allowed the same rate of return on their invested capital as the ACC allows APS and the value should be based on 20 years, not an artificially short time frame.
  3. THE PLAN OPTIONS ARE UNFAIR. The requirement to choose a time-of-use or demand-charge rate plan at the beginning of service is not reasonable. How can homeowners know which plan will be best until they have a little data? Why force them into one of these complicated plans and make them wait for 90 to opt into the flat rate plan most people are comfortable with? Does the average homeowner really want to become a sophisticated energy manager?

    TELL THE ACC: Instead, everyone should be able to choose a flat rate plan at the outset and change plans whenever they want to.
  4. THE LONG-TERM GOAL IS A JOKE. The Renewable Energy Standard is woefully inadequate to incentivize action. APS has virtually achieved the goal for 2035, a pitiful 15 percent. We can do a lot better.  Twenty-five cities have committed to be powered by 100 percent renewable energy and the US Conference of Mayors recently launched a new national initiative with that goal. The Solutions Project has shown a plan for each state to achieve 100 percent renewable by 2050; see their recommendation for AZ below. A number of major corporations are already getting 100 percent green power. With all our sun and other resources and with technological progress, this is an achievable goal. Imagine what the cost of climate change will be if we don't do this.

    TELL THE ACC: The Renewable Energy Standard should be increased to 100% renewable energy by 2050.

 

Why we believe these actions are important

1. APS MAY NOT NEED TO RAISE RATES


According to an AZ Central article:
"The rate increase APS is seeking is unjustified, the 87.5 percent increase to the monthly mandatory charge is unwarranted, and the right for APS — not new customers — to determine what rate plan is best for them for the first 90 days is unconscionable.

"Initially, both the Corporation Commission staff and Residential Utility Consumer Office concluded APS didn’t need to raise rates at all, so the commissioners need to ask them what changed.”  More...


2. THE NEW RATE STRUCTURE UNDERMINES THE ECONOMICS FOR RESIDENTIAL SOLAR.

Net metering, where a kWh a customer generates is considered equal to one they get from APS at night, has been eliminated as policy already by the ACC. They voted but this has not been finalized until the rate case. The plans are to drop significantly the amount solar customers will get for their energy and there is no predictability. The amount solar customers will be paid for their energy is only set for 18 months and expected to drop even more after that.

Many believe net metering has been key to making solar pencil out for customers. With Federal tax credits, solar usually has a 8-12 year payback period. Since people in the US move on average about 7 years, this is already a tough decision if made purely on financial grounds.

The main incentive for the utility to promote residential solar is mostly PR and the potential to avoid building another power plant. But utilities are paid an 'allowable return' on capital (ie, their plants and other infrastructure), particularly generous percentage in the case of APS. If they don't own the solar, they don't get the return. And large solar arrays are cheaper per kWh. In a nutshell, it's more advantageous to APS to build their own, large solar farms, and in the long run, perhaps cheaper for customers.

That said, the industry is changing rapidly. With developments like Tesla's roofs and battery packs, rooftop solar may end up being a large percentage of our future mix. If the rate structure is driving APS to want to own all the infrastructure, change the rate structure. If individuals are willing to put up a lot of the capital for Arizona to move toward 100 percent renewable energy, don't stand in their way.


3. RATE PLAN OPTIONS ARE UNREASONABLE

AZ Central says:
The tentatively agreed upon mandatory 90 day new rate choice that new customers will potentially have to choose before they are allowed to go to a flat basic rate structure is unreasonable, and new customers should be given their choice of whatever plan they want, including the flat basic rate plan, right from the beginning.More...

4. THE RENEWABLE ENERGY STANDARD IS INSUFFICIENT


Renewable Energy Standard should be increased substantially to spur investments toward 100% renewable energy. A Renewable Portfolio Standard (or Renewable Energy Standard as it is referred to in Arizona) is the percentage of renewable power a utility is supposed to supply. APS proudly states they're already in easy reach of the existing standard. According to the APS website:
Under the Arizona Renewable Energy Standard (RES), which the Arizona Corporation Commission (AAC) adopted in 2006, we’re required to supply an increasing percentage of retail electric energy sales from renewable resources. This percentage increases annually until it reaches 15% in 2015.

While The Solutions Project, which has developed a plan for each state to be 100% renewable using existing technologies, shows Arizona should set these as goals (below), which would add close to 70,000 jobs.


Note that rooftop solar is still a small percentage in their projections but large solar and concentrated solar projects would represent over 60% of our energy production. We believe that The Solutions Project energy mix targets for rooftop solar may be far too conservative. They have not kept abreast of new technologies (like Tesla's solar roof and batteries).

We recognize the need for the state to get the best 'carbon-return-on-investment', get the most renewable energy for our money. But the  economics of solar are changing rapidly. Killing the current industry will set us back, undermining investment by businesses and individuals alike. See the chart from the Earth Policy Institute/Bloomberg to the right. (Article Source)

Since the utility is allowed to get a specified rate of return on its capital investments, why not build solar rates so that homeowners get a similar return until the direction of the solar and storage industry becomes more clear.

Want to get into the 'weeds?'

These are notes provided by Inspiration of Sedona...


This excerpt from a ClimateNexus article gives a basic talking points summary of the current state of the APS Rate Case:


http://climatenexus.org/net-metering-fight-understanding-latest-issue-nation’s-rapidly-changing-electricity-market

In March 2017, after more than five years of attempts at compromise between Arizona Public Service (APS), one of the state’s largest utilities, and solar advocates, the parties settled on a rate design system that gives a set of compensation options to distributed solar customers. The compromise compensation mechanism came after the Arizona Corporation Commission (ACC) voted in December 2016 to eliminate retail net metering. The agreement sets the “export rate” for rooftop solar customers at $0.129 per kilowatt-hour (kWh) for surplus energy that they send back onto the grid, starting in 2017. That rate would decline by 10 percent per year for new rooftop systems, and new customers can lock in their 10-year rate based on the year they sign up for the program. The agreement also creates an “offset rate” of around $0.105 that will be credited to solar customers’ utility bills for every kWh of self-generated solar power they consume.

The rates customers would receive under the new system—either for selling power back onto the grid or the “offset” rate for energy consumed onsite—are below the current rate for retail net metering. Existing solar customers can keep their original retail compensation rate for 20 years. If approved this summer by the ACC, the state energy regulator, Arizona will join a growing list of states where utilities and solar advocates have scrapped retail net metering for compromise deals based on a commonly agreed-to value of solar power.


http://www.azcentral.com/story/money/business/energy/2017/03/23/aps-rate-hike-has-critical-flaws-consumer-groups-say/99456358/



"The rate increase APS is seeking is unjustified, the 87.5 percent increase to the monthly mandatory charge is unwarranted, and the right for APS — not new customers — to determine what rate plan is best for them for the first 90 days is unconscionable," said Diane Brown, executive director of Arizona PIRG, a public interest group.

Brown noted that initially, both the Corporation Commission staff and Residential Utility Consumer Office concluded APS didn’t need to raise rates at all.

“Then as part of the settlement agreement, they signed off on that increase,” she said. “We are hoping the commissioners will ask them what changed.”


The deal will allow solar customers to avoid demand rates for 20 years from the date of their interconnection if they apply for solar before a decision in the case.

People who install solar after new rates take effect will see several changes that reduce the savings they see from their rooftop investment. Solar-industry representatives said the plan isn’t ideal, but it will allow solar installations to continue in APS territory, rather than shut them down, which is what happened in SRP territory after it made more dramatic changes in recent years.

http://www.azcentral.com/story/money/business/energy/2017/03/01/aps-settles-rate-hike-request-6-month-average/98586054/


Arizona Public Service Co. agreed to accept a rate-hike request of $6 a month on average instead of the $11 it was seeking.

The agreement between the state's biggest utility and a majority of parties in the case must be approved by utility regulators.



Thirty of the 40 parties in the case, including Corporation Commission staff and the Residential Utility Consumer Office, have agreed to the settlement, which covers all APS homes across all seasons.

The settlement also calls for optional "demand charges" rather than mandatory demand charges APS sought for most residential customers.

Demand rates would charge less for each kilowatt-hour of electricity a customer uses during the month. But they also single out the highest one-hour use of electricity during peak hours in a month and assess a fee based on how high that hourly demand reaches.

One additional issue people can contact the ACC about is the tentatively agreed upon mandatory 90 day new rate choice that new customers will potentially have to choose before they are allowed to go to a flat basic rate structure, which is outlined in the new insanely complicated rate design system, (http://docket.images.azcc.gov/0000177680.pdf): (Typos are from the original.)




Agreed-upon Rate Design Terms


l) Residentialratedesign.

a. R-XS: Available to customers without distributed generation using less than 600

kph per month on average. Basic Service Charge $10.

b. R-Basic: Basic Service Charge $15. Available to customers without distributed

generation using more than 600 kph but less than 1,000 kph per month on

average.

c. R-Basic Large: Basic Service Charge $20. Available to customers without

distributed generation using 1,000 kph per month or more on average.

d. TOU-E: Available to all customers. Basic Service Charge $13. Winter Super Off- peak from 10:00am - 3:00pm weekdays. Average off-set rate inclusive of the Grid Access Charge described in Paragraph 4. Customers currently on a Time Advantage rate plan will transition to this rate unless they select to voluntarily move

to another rate for which they are eligible.

R-2: Available to all customers. Basic Service Charge $13.

R-3: Available to all customers. Basic Service Charge $13. Customers currently

on the Combined Advantage rate plan will transition to this rate unless they select

to voluntarily move to another rate for which they are eligible.

g. R-Tech Pilot Rate Program:

i. An Optional R-Tech Pilot Rate Program shall be created that will initially serve up to 10.000 customers. Once 6,000 customers have signed up to take service under this program, and if such threshold has been reached prior to the Company's next general rate case filing, the Company shall provide notice and promptly convene a meeting of the interested parties to this Docket to discuss the future of the Pilot Program. If each of the parties to that discussion agree on a new customer participation level for the R-Tech Pilot Program that shall apply until the Commission determines the disposition of the R-Tech Pilot Program during the Companys next general rate case the Company shall file a notice in this Docket to that effect and the program shall continue to be ottered up to the new agreed upon customer participation level. However, if all parties cannot agree to a new customer participation level. then APS shall tile a report on the R-Tech Pilot Program and request that the Commission determine whether to continue, expand. or terminate the program in the Docket within 90 days of the date that 7,000 customers have begun taking service under this program. The Commission will then promptly review the program and determine if it should continue. terminate, or be adjusted.

ii. The Parties have agreed to a rate design for the R-Tech Pilot Rate Program as set thanh on Exhibit A attached hereto.

h. The TOU on peak period will be 3:00 p.m. to 8:00 pm. weekdays for TOU-E, R-2, R-3, R-Tech and XS General Service.

2) RateAvailabilitv.AllcustomersmayselectR-Basic,R-BasicLarge,TOU-E.R-2,orR-3. including R-Tech or R-XS if they qualify, until May l. 2018. except to the extent grandfathered under other sections of this Settlement Agreement. Distributed generation customers will not be eligible for R-XS, R-Basic or R-Basic Large. After May l, 2018, R- Basic Large will no longer be available to new customers or customers who are on another rate. New customers alter May 1, 2018 may choose TOU-E. R-2, R-3 or if they qualify R- XS or R-Tech for 90 days. Alter 90 days new customers may opt-out of their current rate and select R-Basic if they qualify. Customers transitioning to R-Basic must stay on that rate for at least 12 months.

1 comment:

  1. UPDATE from Marty Landa:

    A BIG WIN FOR SOLAR IN NEVADA! -- And why you need to make your voice heard on the upcoming APS rate case here in Arizona!

    We had some incredible news a few weeks ago. The Nevada state legislature voted to reinstate solar net metering (which is essentially the same thing as voting for residential rooftop solar) and bring back companies like SunRun and Tesla to the state. The decision was the result of consumer demand and pressure brought on by Years of Living Dangerously and other media outlets. Some may recall that Season Two’s premiere episode we showed (starring Cecily Strong of SNL fame) was about the fights taking place over rooftop solar, specifically in Nevada and Florida, where, incidentally, a pro-solar bill awaits the governor’s signature; if signed, homeowners would have a much easier time going solar in the Sunshine State.

    The Arizona Corporation Commission was expected to vote on the proposed APS rate case changes and was planning to follow through on their decision to eliminate net metering in Arizona, but did not vote on it at their June meeting. The vote will now not take place until the mid-July meeting at the earliest. If you want to ensure that you have solar with the full monetary advantages of net metering, you will need to choose to install a system before the vote. (You can talk to Thomas Bruck with Verde Solar Power about how to do this.)

    Please write the Arizona Corporation Commission about the upcoming rate case and urge them to support the growth of solar in our state and not undermine the viability of residential rooftop solar.

    ReplyDelete